Construction, architecture, and engineering
Construction and Engineering Cybersecurity
Construction cybersecurity starts with the money and the drawings: progress payments released by wire, and project files shared with every sub, architect, and owner on the job. Invadel tests email, project platforms, jobsite networks, and the office behind them at a fixed price, with a free retest.






The stakes
Why construction cybersecurity is different
Attackers follow the payment schedule. A subcontractor’s mailbox is compromised, and days before a pay application is funded a letter arrives with new bank details. Or a project manager’s account sends an owner altered wire instructions for a progress payment. Behind the money sit estimates, bid history, and drawings, spread across a project platform with hundreds of outside users and an accounting system published to the internet so the field can reach it.
The requirements reach contractors through owners, primes, and insurers rather than one regulator. Contractors and design firms on Defense Department work that receive drawings or specifications marked as controlled unclassified information must protect them under DFARS 252.204-7012 and NIST SP 800-171. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey projects that involve protected information require signed NDAs and encrypted handling of protected drawings. Owners send security questionnaires at prequalification, and cyber insurers ask about MFA, remote access, and testing at renewal.
A generic test scans the head office and misses how a construction company works. Much of the business runs outside that network: in the email tenant, in Procore or Autodesk Construction Cloud, in shared drawing links, and in site trailers connected over LTE. Staff and subcontractors change with every project, and their accounts outlive the job. Testing has to follow the payment and the drawing set, not just the firewall.
What we test
The systems attackers go after first
Email and the payment workflow
Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace and the approvals behind pay applications, change orders, and retainage releases, tested for MFA gaps, forwarding rules, and bank-detail changes accepted on email alone.
Project management platforms
Procore, Autodesk Construction Cloud, and similar platforms, tested for stale outside accounts, permissions that expose budgets and commitments, and public links to drawings and submittals.
Construction accounting and ERP
Job cost, payroll, and payables systems, often published through remote desktop for field staff, tested for password spraying exposure, shared logins, and reach into vendor bank records.
Jobsite trailers and site networks
Temporary networks in site offices, with LTE routers, Wi-Fi, cameras, time clocks, and plotters, tested for default credentials, exposed remote management, and routes back to the head office.
Head office network and file shares
The servers and Active Directory domain holding estimates, drawings, and bid history, tested from an assumed foothold for the paths ransomware operators use to reach every project at once.
Project managers, AP, and field staff
Phishing, voice, and text campaigns built around real construction workflows: a subcontractor’s new bank letter, an urgent RFI link, or a shared drawing set that asks for a login.
Compliance
The frameworks that usually apply
- CMMC Level 2
For contractors and design firms on Defense Department projects that handle controlled unclassified information. Since the July 2026 suspension of Phase 2, solicitations may require only a Level 1 or Level 2 self-assessment.
- NIST SP 800-171
The 110 security requirements that DFARS 252.204-7012 applies to covered defense information, including drawings and specifications marked CUI that flow down from the prime.
- Cyber insurance
Contractor renewal forms often ask about MFA on email and remote access, backups, and how payment changes are verified. The phishing results, attestation letter, and retest results support the answers.
Port Authority security rules
NDAs, background screening, and encrypted storage and exchange of protected drawings under the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey’s Information Security Handbook.
Services
What contractors and design firms usually buy
- From $3,600
Phishing Simulation & Social Engineering Testing
Phishing and social engineering campaigns that measure real-world human risk, with click and credential metrics by department, from $3,600.
- From $4,200
Microsoft 365 Security Assessment
A manual review of your Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace tenant: identity and MFA, mail security, sharing, and OAuth apps, plus an optional attack simulation. From $4,200.
- From $4,200
External Network Penetration Testing
Testing of your internet-facing perimeter, from exposed services and VPN gateways to mail and cloud edges, with a free retest, from $4,200.
- From $6,000
Internal Network Penetration Testing
Testing from an assumed foothold inside your network: Active Directory attack paths, lateral movement, and segmentation, from $6,000.
- From $1,500
Vulnerability Scanning Services
Managed scanning validated by an analyst, which cuts false positives down to real, ranked risk you can act on at once. From $1,500 per scan.
Prequalification
What owners, primes, and insurers ask contractors for
Security requirements reach a construction company through contracts, prequalification forms, and insurance renewals rather than a single regulator. These are the requests that come up most, and what an engagement puts in the file for each.
Defense Department primes and agencies
- What they ask for
- Protection of drawings and specifications marked CUI under DFARS 252.204-7012, and a CMMC Level 2 self-assessment against NIST SP 800-171
- What goes in the file
- External and internal testing of the enclave that holds CUI, with findings mapped to NIST SP 800-171 for the System Security Plan and the plan of action
Port Authority of NY and NJ projects
- What they ask for
- Signed NDAs, background screening, and encrypted storage and exchange of protected drawings
- What goes in the file
- A test of the file shares, email, and collaboration platform where protected drawings actually live, showing who can reach them
Owners and general contractors at prequalification
- What they ask for
- A recent independent penetration test and proof that serious findings were fixed
- What goes in the file
- An executive summary and attestation letter for the questionnaire, a technical report for IT, and free retest results
Cyber insurers at renewal
- What they ask for
- MFA on email and remote access, backups that would survive an attack, and a callback before any change to payment details
- What goes in the file
- An external test of remote access and a review of the email tenant’s MFA and conditional access
Your own finance team
- What they ask for
- Confidence that a bank-detail change sent by email will not be paid
- What goes in the file
- A phishing campaign against AP and project staff built around pay applications and change orders, showing whether the callback procedure holds
Own or manage the buildings after turnover? Our real estate and proptech page covers building systems, tenant portals, and closing wire fraud.
How it runs
Typical engagements
Illustrative scopes for this industry, written to show what a test covers and what you walk away with.
They are not client stories; our anonymized engagements are on the case studies page.
Typical engagement
General contractor after a pay-application fraud attempt
A mid-sized general contractor catches a fraudulent bank-change letter that arrived from a real subcontractor’s mailbox days before a pay application was funded. We run a phishing campaign across project managers, accounts payable, and field staff, and review the Microsoft 365 tenant for MFA gaps and forwarding rules. The external test covers the remote desktop gateway the field uses. The principals receive ranked fixes, including a callback rule for every bank-detail change, and the tenant and gateway fixes are retested at no cost.
Typical engagement
Engineering firm on a Defense Department project
An engineering firm designing a military facility receives specifications marked as controlled unclassified information from the prime. We test the external boundary, then the enclave from an assumed foothold on the office network, and check whether CUI drawings have spread to general file shares and the project platform. Findings map to NIST SP 800-171 for the self-assessment and the System Security Plan, and the retest documents each fix before the self-assessment score is posted and affirmed.
Typical engagement
Subcontractor running a dozen jobsites
An electrical subcontractor with a dozen active jobsites wants to know what a stolen trailer laptop or an exposed site router could reach. We test a representative trailer network, including the LTE router, cameras, and Wi-Fi, and the VPN back to the head office. An internal test follows from a field laptop into Active Directory and the estimating file share. The report gives IT a standard trailer build, and the retest confirms it before the next site opens.
FAQ
What contractors and engineering firms ask
01Why do construction companies need cybersecurity testing?
Because construction moves large payments by wire on a predictable schedule, and attackers know it. Much of the risk is simple: a bank-detail change sent from a compromised mailbox and paid without a callback. Owners, primes, and insurers now ask for evidence as well: a recent independent test, MFA on email and remote access, and proof that serious findings were fixed. A test shows where the payment process and the network would break before an attacker finds out.
02Which test should a contractor run first?
For most firms, a phishing campaign against project managers and accounts payable, paired with a Microsoft 365 security assessment from $4,200 that checks MFA, conditional access, and mailbox forwarding rules. That covers the wire fraud path. Next comes an external test of the remote desktop or VPN the field uses, also from $4,200. Firms with many jobsites add an internal test from a trailer laptop.
03Is cybersecurity for engineering and architecture firms any different?
The payment risk is smaller and the drawing risk is larger. Design firms hold models, drawings, and specifications for many owners at once, usually on a file server or cloud drive shared with outside consultants. Testing focuses on who can reach those files: the collaboration links, the remote access, the Active Directory permissions, and, on defense work, the boundary around anything marked CUI.
04Does CMMC apply to construction and engineering firms?
It applies to contractors and subcontractors on Defense Department contracts that handle federal contract information or controlled unclassified information, and drawings and specifications for defense facilities can be marked CUI. In July 2026 the Department suspended Phase 2, the move to third-party assessments, so solicitations can currently require only a CMMC Level 1 or Level 2 self-assessment, while DFARS 252.204-7012 and NIST SP 800-171 remain in effect. Our CMMC Level 2 checklist walks through all 110 requirements and where testing supports them.
05Can you test a jobsite network without disrupting the work?
Yes. Jobsite testing runs in agreed windows, stays away from anything that controls equipment or life safety, and never uses denial-of-service techniques. We test one representative trailer build on site, including the router, Wi-Fi, and cameras, and apply the findings to the rest. On-site wireless testing of a site office in the New York metro starts at $3,800, and a network segmentation test confirms a trailer cannot reach the head office.
06How would ransomware hit a construction company?
Usually through a phished account or an exposed remote access gateway, then across the head office to the file server and the accounting system. When those go down, estimating, billing, and payroll stop on every project at once. A ransomware readiness assessment from $6,000 tests that path from an assumed foothold and checks whether backups would survive. Our guide to how ransomware attacks work explains each stage.
07How much does cybersecurity testing cost for a construction company?
A phishing campaign starts at $3,600, external network testing at $4,200, internal network testing at $6,000, and a validated vulnerability scan from $1,500. Each price is fixed in writing before work starts, and the penetration tests include a free retest of remediated findings. A typical first engagement combines phishing with an external test, quoted as one number. Pricing follows the scope, not the size of your backlog, and every starting price is on our penetration testing pricing page.
Get a fixed price for your construction scope
Tell us what needs testing. You get a written fixed price within one business day, with the compliance mapping your auditors and customers expect.
Prefer the full scoping questionnaire?Get a Fixed-Scope Quote
Tell us what you need tested. We reply within one business day.
Thanks, we've received your message.
We'll be in touch shortly.