Skip to content

Application

Web Application
Penetration
Testing Services

Starts at $5,200, fixed scope, free retest. See all pricing →

Get a fixed quote

Reply in one business day

Senior certified testers, manual-first185+ years combined experienceOnboarding within 24 hoursFree retest includedOur methodology

When you need it

When you need web application penetration testing

The situations that bring teams to this engagement, and where it fits alongside the rest of your program.

  • Your SOC 2, ISO 27001, or PCI DSS audit expects penetration testing evidence for the application in scope.
  • An enterprise customer sent a security questionnaire that asks for a recent third-party application test.
  • You are about to launch a new application, ship a major release, or re-platform the frontend, and want it tested first.
  • The application handles payments, health records, or other regulated data, where PCI DSS 11.4 and the HIPAA Security Rule apply.
  • A bug-bounty report, scanner alert, or incident left you with findings you want validated and prioritized by a human.
  • You ship weekly and an annual test leaves months of blind spots, in which case a recurring testing program may fit better.

Definition

What is web application penetration testing?

Web application penetration testing is senior, manual testing of your browser-facing application across the OWASP Top 10, business logic, and every user role, from an attacker’s point of view. It goes beyond a scanner: testers use real accounts to chain access-control, logic, and data-exposure flaws into proven impact. As a web application penetration testing company, we fix the scope and the price before work begins, from $5,200 with a free retest.

The engagement

How a web application penetration test runs

Web application penetration testing services follow the same shape every time, agreed in writing before testing starts, so the proposal, the report, and the auditor all describe the same engagement.

What happens

Scope
The application, its user roles, and the APIs it calls, counted from your scope form or a short call. Staging where one exists; production under written rules of engagement where it does not. One fixed price for the whole scope, no hourly billing.
Method
Gray box by default, with a test account for each role and any documentation; black box on request for a public application, and white box when paired with a code review. Manual testing against the OWASP Top 10 and the Web Security Testing Guide, with tooling driven by the tester.
Timeline
Onboarding within 24 hours of a signed proposal, about one week of testing for a single application with a couple of roles, and critical findings escalated the day they are confirmed rather than held for the report.
Deliverables
An executive summary and technical report with reproduction steps and CVSS ratings, a free retest of remediated findings, and a letter of attestation for auditors, customers, and insurers.

A web app pentest is the engagement most SOC 2, PCI DSS, and enterprise security reviews ask for by name. Read what a penetration test costs for every published price, or see the web application testing price tiers.

What we look for

Web application vulnerabilities we hunt for

Testing follows the OWASP Testing Guide and real attacker behavior, pairing manual exploitation with targeted tooling across the flaw classes that actually lead to breaches.

Injection

Untrusted input reaching an interpreter as a command or query, letting an attacker read, alter, or destroy backend data.

We test for

  • SQL, NoSQL, and GraphQL injection
  • OS command injection
  • LDAP injection
  • Server-side template injection (SSTI)
  • Input validation and encoding gaps

Broken Access Control & IDOR

Missing or flawed authorization that exposes data and actions meant to be off-limits, including other users’ records.

We test for

  • Insecure direct object references (IDOR)
  • Horizontal and vertical privilege escalation
  • Forced browsing to hidden functions
  • Parameter and identifier tampering
  • Over-permissive or unprotected endpoints
  • GraphQL object- and field-level authorization

Broken Authentication & Sessions

Weak identity and session handling that opens the door to account takeover and impersonation.

We test for

  • Weak or default credentials
  • Missing or bypassable MFA
  • Insecure session handling and fixation
  • Password reset and recovery flaws
  • Brute-force and credential-stuffing exposure

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

Malicious scripts injected into pages other users load and trust, used to steal sessions or act as the victim.

We test for

  • Reflected XSS
  • Stored XSS
  • DOM-based XSS
  • Unsafe output rendering
  • HTML and JavaScript injection points

Business Logic Abuse

Legitimate features abused in ways the application never intended, often invisible to automated scanners.

We test for

  • Workflow and sequence bypass
  • Price, quantity, and discount manipulation
  • Race conditions
  • Insufficient limits on sensitive actions
  • Abuse of trust between steps

Security Misconfiguration

Insecure defaults, verbose errors, and exposed components that hand attackers an easy foothold.

We test for

  • Default credentials and sample content
  • Verbose errors and stack traces
  • Misconfigured security headers and CORS
  • Exposed admin panels and directories
  • Unpatched components and dependencies

SSRF & Request Forgery

Requests the server or the browser can be tricked into sending on an attacker’s behalf, reaching internal services, cloud metadata, or other users’ accounts.

We test for

  • Server-side request forgery (SSRF) to internal services and cloud metadata
  • Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) on state-changing actions
  • Open redirects and URL parser confusion
  • Host header and web cache poisoning
  • Webhook and callback URL abuse

File Upload, XXE & Deserialization

Features that accept files or structured data and end up executing, parsing, or storing far more than they should.

We test for

  • Unrestricted file upload and content-type bypass
  • Path traversal and local file inclusion
  • XML external entity (XXE) injection
  • Insecure deserialization
  • Client-side flaws: DOM clobbering and prototype pollution

Manual first

What a scanner misses, and why we test by hand

Automated tooling maps the surface. The findings that decide whether an application is safe are chained and logic-driven, and they come from testers reading the application the way an attacker does. Three examples from our case studies:

File inclusion plus an authorization bypass

In a payroll and HR platform, a file-inclusion flaw exposed server files and an authorization bypass let an admin create or delete owners. Neither matches a scanner signature.

Framework RCE chained with SSRF and an unthrottled OTP

A fintech marketplace had remote code execution in its web framework, a reachable SSRF, and a login flow with no rate limiting on password or SMS code entry. The RCE was fixed mid-engagement.

Data exposure hiding in ordinary responses

A payments back office returned precise geolocation and transaction metadata in normal API responses. Every response was a valid 200, so no scanner flagged it.

Standards

Standards, tooling, and depth

Standards guarantee coverage; the tester’s judgment finds what the standards do not list. What every engagement applies:

How we apply it

OWASP Top 10 and WSTG
Coverage evidence against the OWASP Top 10 and the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide in every report.
OWASP ASVS
Verification depth to OWASP ASVS Level 2 by default, and Level 3 for high-assurance applications.
Risk rating
Findings rated with CVSS v3.1 (v4 on request) and mapped to CWE, with business impact stated in plain language.
Tooling
Burp Suite Professional, Gobuster for hidden directory and content discovery, and purpose-built Invadel tooling, all driven by testers rather than left to run alone.
Roles and tenants
Authenticated testing across every user role and tenant you provide, including administrator and API-only roles.
Modern stacks
Single-page applications, JavaScript-heavy frontends, and GraphQL backends tested with the same depth as server-rendered apps.

Methodology

Web application penetration testing methodology

Full methodology →

Every engagement follows the Penetration Testing Execution Standard and the relevant OWASP guides.

These are the phases your web application penetration testing runs through.

  1. 01

    Scope & threat model

    Roles, tenants, data flows, and the abuse cases that matter most to your business.

  2. 02

    Recon & mapping

    Every endpoint, parameter, and integration enumerated before a single payload is sent.

  3. 03

    Manual exploitation

    OWASP-guided manual testing with targeted tooling, chaining findings into real attack paths.

  4. 04

    Impact validation

    Each finding proven exploitable and rated by what an attacker could actually reach.

  5. 05

    Report & retest

    Executive and technical reports, then a free retest once your fixes ship.

How it works

How your engagement runs

From scope through the final retest, your team stays in the loop at every step, with findings tracked live in our platform.

  1. 01

    Scope & kickoff

    Targets, roles, and rules of engagement defined in writing, with a fixed scope and timeline.

  2. 02

    Testing goes live

    Findings post to your live platform dashboard the moment our testers confirm them.

  3. 03

    Track remediation

    Follow every finding from open to fixed, with severity, evidence, and status in one place.

  4. 04

    Report & retest

    Executive and technical reports land, then request a free retest in one click.

Proof

Proof in the field

Every engagement is confidential, so the work below is anonymized to sector and engagement type.

All case studies →

Free

Retest on every penetration test

185+

Years combined experience

14

Senior in-house specialists

24h

Onboarding after signing

HR & Payroll SaaS

Web Application Penetration Test

High risk

Critical: a file-inclusion flaw that let an attacker read sensitive files from the server through the application itself. High: stored cross-site scripting capable of session theft, insecure direct object references, and an authorization bypass that let an administrator create or delete organization owners.

Outcome. Delivered a remediation plan sequenced by real business impact, critical and high findings first, with a complimentary retest to verify every fix.

28

Findings

1

Critical

5

High

Read the case study

Fintech · Payments

Web Application Penetration Test

High risk

Critical: a remote code execution flaw in the application’s web framework that could have given an attacker full control of the server. We escalated it to the development team while the test was still running.

Outcome. The critical RCE was reported and remediated during the engagement via an emergency framework upgrade, which also closed the server-side request forgery, and the remaining findings were retested to confirmation.

1

Critical (RCE)

Mid-test

Critical remediated

2

High

Read the case study

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What teams most often ask before scoping web application penetration testing.

Still have questions? 
01What is the difference between a web application penetration test and a vulnerability scan?

A vulnerability scan uses automated tooling to flag known weaknesses in a web application. A penetration test goes further, showing how well your existing defenses hold up against a real-world attacker who chains those weaknesses together, abuses business logic, and works toward your data the way a cybercriminal actually would.

02Is web application security testing the same as a penetration test?

Web application security testing is the umbrella term for any evaluation of how secure a web app is, from automated scans to code review. A web application penetration test is the deepest form of it: senior testers manually attack the application the way a real adversary would and validate which weaknesses are genuinely exploitable. When a client, auditor, or framework asks for web application security testing, a manual penetration test is the strongest evidence you can provide. Buyers often call the same engagement website penetration testing, which usually means this test scoped to a public-facing site.

03How long does a web application penetration test take?

Initial testing for most engagements takes approximately one week. Once we confirm any critical findings, we share them right away alongside an executive presentation of the results and clear remediation guidance. After your team applies the fixes, we run a full retest at no additional cost.

04What does a web application penetration test entail?

Our dedicated security specialists tailor the breadth and depth of testing to your application's architecture and its cloud deployment and service model. We combine automated dynamic analysis with heavy manual testing of the user-facing interface, validating it against the OWASP Top Ten and the wider OWASP Testing Guide to confirm real, exploitable impact rather than theoretical risk.

05Who needs a web application penetration test?

Any organization that relies on a web application to run its business or handle sensitive data. It is an essential tool for confirming that your security controls actually work, and for meeting compliance mandates that apply to your application. Most organizations benefit from testing annually, or twice a year for higher-risk or frequently updated applications.

06How much does a web application penetration test cost?

Our web application penetration tests start at $5,200 for a small application, with the price fixed before work begins, no hourly billing, and a free retest of remediated findings is included. Medium applications start at $7,800 and large or multi-tenant platforms at $12,500 and up, with your exact figure confirmed in writing from your scope details, no sales call required. You can see starting prices for every service on our pricing page.

07Do you test authenticated areas and multiple user roles?

Yes. Most serious findings live behind the login. We test every role and tenant you provision, from anonymous visitor through end user to administrator, and look specifically for horizontal and vertical access-control failures between them. Provide a test account for each role during scoping and we exercise all of them.

08Black box, gray box, or white box: which should we choose?

Gray box is the default for most web application tests: we get credentials and documentation, which lets us spend the engagement on depth instead of guesswork. Black box models an outside attacker with nothing, useful for a first look at a public application. White box adds source code and is the most thorough option when you pair the test with a secure code review. Our guide to black, gray, and white box testing covers the trade-offs.

09Will testing affect our production environment?

We test against staging or a dedicated test environment whenever one exists. When production is the only option, we agree rules of engagement in advance: no denial-of-service techniques, no destructive payloads, defined testing windows, and immediate escalation of anything critical. Fixed scope means you know exactly what is being tested and when.

Ready to test your defenses?

Talk to our team about scoping web application penetration testing.

Prefer the full scoping questionnaire? 

Get a Fixed-Scope Quote

Tell us what you need tested. We reply within one business day.